Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:40

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Apple Unveils AI-Powered 'Workout Buddy' for Apple Watch at WWDC - MacRumors
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
3 Economic Events That Could Affect Your Portfolio This Week, June 16-20, 2025 - TipRanks
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Discover Why These 2025 Milky Way Photos Are Shaking the Astrophotography World - The Daily Galaxy
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Julio Rodríguez addresses robbery at his home - MLB.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
14,000-year-old mummified 'puppies' weren't dogs at all, new research shows - KSL News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Which K-pop idol has a good fashion sense in your opinion?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
FBC: Firebreak Gets Update 1.2 as Remedy Promises Lots More Fixes - Wccftech
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
President Xi Jinping Speaks with U.S. President Donald J. Trump on the Phone - fmprc.gov.cn